VENUS REPORT CYCLE 2026
Three reports of the Venus Academy of Aesthetic Medicine on the quality of care, the limits of professional competence and rights
and the patient’s responsibilities in aesthetic and remedial medicine.
The publications organize the most important issues related to safety and responsibility – for professionals, patients and all those interested in the conscious development of this field.
Get free access to all three reports
Complete the short form to receive the complete set of publications from the Venus Reports 2026 series. After submitting, you will receive an email with links to download all three reports in PDF format.
Form
Preparation of reports
The project organiser, publisher and entity fully funding the reports from its own resources is Pharma Medical House Sp. z o.o. PMH carried out the organisational and publishing work. Decisions on the content were taken by the Venus Academy Council, which approved the latest amendments on 1 September 2026. The organiser declares that there are no conflicts of interest amongst the authors.
Methodology and currency of sources:
Quality standard: analysis of existing data and proposed quality criteria. Cutoff date for sources: 16 April 2026.
Competences: comparative analysis of regulations and professional competences. Status of sources and legislation: 7 June 2026.
Symmetry: analysis of rights and obligations, and recommendations regarding patient relations. Status of sources and legislation: 25 July 2026.
Authors and affiliations, detailed methodology, limitations and bibliography can be found in the full reports.
PREMIERE SUMMARY VENUS REPORTS 2026
On September 19, 2026, a press conference was held at the InterContinental Hotel in Warsaw during the IADE Energy Congress, celebrating the launch of three Venus Academy reports. The meeting focused on patient safety, the competencies of those performing procedures, and accountability for the entire care process—from qualification to handling complications.
The conference’s most important message: quality in aesthetic medicine should be assessed based on specific criteria. A facility’s recognition, price, or photos of its results are not sufficient to assess its readiness to provide safe patient care.
The presented publications show three complementary perspectives:
The “Venus 2026 Quality Standard” proposes criteria for assessing the performance of facilities and organizes the importance of scientific evidence regarding preparations and devices.
“Who can perform aesthetic and restorative medicine procedures?” analyzes the competencies of the practitioners and emphasizes the importance of preparing for a specific procedure and treating its complications.
“Symmetry: The Rights and Obligations of the Aesthetic Medicine Patient” discusses informed decision-making, mutual responsibility, and the physician’s right to refuse a procedure.
For physicians, clinic managers, manufacturers, and distributors, the reports provide a common point of reference for discussing industry standards. They can be used to review care organization, plan training, and improve patient communication. They present expert recommendations—they do not establish new regulations or establish rankings for clinics.
The conference was an opportunity to present these studies and to invite the community to a substantive discussion on the proposed quality criteria.
